Exam FMLoansFree to read

Sinking funds

The borrower pays the lender interest only and saves separately to repay the principal in one lump - two rates, two cash flows, one total outlay.

The formulas

Sinking fund deposit
D=Lsn‾∣jD = \dfrac{L}{s_{\overline{n}|j}}

j is the rate the fund earns

Total outlay
Total=Li+D\text{Total} = Li + D
Equivalent amortisation
Li+Lsn‾∣j=Lan‾∣i  ⟺  i=jLi + \dfrac{L}{s_{\overline{n}|j}} = \dfrac{L}{a_{\overline{n}|i}} \iff i = j
Net amount owed
L−D st‾∣jL - D\,s_{\overline{t}|j}

Where it comes from

  1. The lender is kept whole each period by the interest payment LiLi, so the principal LL is still owed at time nn.
  2. The fund must accumulate to LL: level deposits DD accumulate to D sn‾∣jD\,s_{\overline{n}|j}, so D=L/sn‾∣jD = L/s_{\overline{n}|j}.
  3. When j=ij = i the total outlay is exactly the amortisation payment, because 1an‾∣i=i+1sn‾∣i\frac{1}{a_{\overline n|i}} = i + \frac{1}{s_{\overline n|i}} - the identity to remember.

Worked example

A 100,000 loan charges 7% interest annually, repaid in 12 years by the sinking-fund method with the fund earning 5%. Find the total annual outlay.

  1. Interest to the lender: 100,000×0.07=7,000100{,}000 \times 0.07 = 7{,}000 a year.
  2. s12‾∣0.05=15.917127s_{\overline{12}|0.05} = 15.917127, so the deposit is 100,000/15.917127=6,282.54100{,}000/15.917127 = 6{,}282.54.
  3. Total annual outlay =7,000+6,282.54=13,282.54= 7{,}000 + 6{,}282.54 = 13{,}282.54.
  4. Compare with straight amortisation at 7%: 100,000/a12‾∣0.07=12,590.20100{,}000/a_{\overline{12}|0.07} = 12{,}590.20 - cheaper, because the fund earns less than the loan costs.

Answer: 13,282.54

This answer is recomputed from the site’s own interest-theory and probability functions every time the test suite runs, so the page and the mathematics cannot drift apart.

Memory hooks

  • 1/aₙ = i + 1/sₙ. That single identity is the bridge between amortisation and sinking funds.
  • Two rates: the loan rate goes to the lender, the fund rate grows your savings. Never mix them.

Traps

  • Using aₙ instead of sₙ for the deposit - the fund ACCUMULATES.
  • Assuming the sinking-fund method is always more expensive; it is cheaper exactly when j > i.

Related

Drill this: the Exam FM question bank has original questions on this topic, and today’s free round is open to everyone.